Marks Should Not Be the Focus of Assessment – But How Can Change Be Achieved?

Darrall G Thompson

Abstract


This paper attempts to address the possibility of real change after a hundred years of exam-based assessments that produce a single mark or grade as feedback on students’ progress and abilities. It uses design thinking and a reframing of the assessment space to foreground an attribute-based approach that retains the diversity of aspects of a student’s performance across subject boundaries. There are a number of rationales and concepts built into this approach that aim to divert staff and student focus from marks, content delivery, and retention, towards the development of knowledge literacies, conceptual frameworks, and a broad range of personal qualities and skills. Web-based software (REVIEW) developed and refined for more than a decade to facilitate this approach retains categorised student progress data through the day-to-day criterion-referenced marking of assignments and exams. Education research cited proposes that institutions should engage students as a partner in their personal and professional development rather than as a customer buying a degree. It is suggested and illustrated in this paper that the use of self-assessment and visual feedback on different categories of progress is part of the key to forming such a partnership.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Assiter, A. (Ed.). (1995). Transferable skills in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

BIHEC (2007) Business, Industry and Higher Education Collaboration Council. Graduate Employability skills report. Commonwealth of Australia, 2007, ISBN: 0 642 77701 2

Boud, D., Lawson, R., Thompson, DG. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(8) 941-956. Routledge. UK.

Dorst, K. (2011) The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application, Design Studies, 32(6), 521-532,

Drew, S., Thorpe, L. and Bannister, P. (2002) Key skills computerised assessments, Guiding principles, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (2), 175-186

Eisner, E.W. What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? John Dewey Lecture 2002 http://www.infed.org/biblio/eisner_arts_and_the_practice_of_education.htm (accessed 7 Dec. 2011)

Higher Education Council (1992), Higher Education: Achieving Quality. October, 1992 AGPS Canberra

Kimbell, L. (2009) Beyond design thinking: Design-as-practice and designs-in-practice CRESC Conference (Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change), Manchester, September 2009

Lawson, B. (2005) How Designers Think. Architectural Press. 4th Ed. Elsevier. UK

Lomas, L. (2007) Are Students Customers? Perceptions of Academic Staff. Quality in Higher Education. 13(1)

Mayer, K. (1992) Key Competencies, Report to Ministers of VEET, AEC Australia

Owen, C. (2006) Design Thinking: Notes on Its Nature and Use Design Research Quarterly 1(2)

Pitman, T. (2000) Perceptions of Academics and Students as Customers: A survey of administrative staff in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 22(2)

Ramsden, P. (2008). The future of higher education teaching and the student experience. http://www.bis.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/HE-Teaching-Student-Experience.pdf (16.1.2015)

Razzouk & Shute, (2012). What is Design Thinking and Why is it Important? Review of Educational Research 82(3), 330–348

Sankey, M., & Lawrence, R. (2003). Suicide and risk-taking deaths of children and young people. New South Wales Commission for Children and Young People, Child Death Review Team, & Centre for Mental Health.

Thompson, D.G. (2009). Successful engagement in graduate attribute assessment using software, Campus-Wide Information Systems, (26) 5, 400-412

Wright, P. (1995). The Higher Education Quality Council, Quality Enhancement Group. Canberra, ACT




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.9

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.