Knowledge Building Analytics to Explore Crossing Disciplinary and Grade-Level Boundaries
Keywords:Knowledge Building, Learning analytics, Exceeding Expectations
Sustained creative work with ideas, work that leads beyond expectations, underpins knowledge creating organizations. Knowledge Building pedagogy, with its 12 principles and associated technology, Knowledge Forum, aims to provide necessary support for this goal. This exploratory study aims to assess the extent to which elementary-school students within Knowledge Building communities are able to exceed curriculum expectations. We defined “criss-crossing topics” as an indicator of exceeding expectations, and examined whether students are able to think and theorize in an interdisciplinary way and, in doing so, exceed curriculum expectations. We also examined how such criss-crossing topics may help advance the community knowledge. Results show that, when given agency, elementary students are able to extend knowledge boundaries, bringing greater range and explanatory coherence to their work, resulting in advancing community knowledge and idea improvement.
Aslan, Y. (2016). The effect of cross-curricular instruction on reading comprehension. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8). 1797–1801. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040808
Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29, 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2901_1
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order thinking skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 9–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1987.11075275
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., Cassells, C., & Hewitt, J. (1997). Postmodernism, knowledge building, and elementary science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 329–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461869
Burtis, J. (1998). Analytic toolkit for knowledge forum. Centre for Applied Cognitive Science, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto
Chen, B., Ma, L., Matsuzawa, Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2015). The development of productive vocabulary in knowledge building: A longitudinal study. In O. Lindwall, P. Hakkinen, T. Koschmann, P. Tchounikine, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2015), 7–11 June 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden (Volume 1, pp. 443–450). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/cscl2015.401
Chen, B., Resendes, M., Chai, C. S., & Hong, H.-Y. (2017). Two tales of time: Uncovering the significance of sequential patterns among contribution types in knowledge-building discourse. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 162– 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1276081
Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9225-z
Chuy, M., Resendes, M., Tarchi, C., Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2011). Ways of contributing to an explanation-seeking dialogue in science and history. QWERTY: Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 6(2), 242–260.
Chuy, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Prinsen, F., Resendes, M., Messina, R., Hunsburger, W., Teplovs, C., & Chow, A. (2010). Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.21432/T2GP4R
Cole, D., Ullman, J., Gannon, S., & Rooney J. (2015). Critical thinking skills in the international baccalaureate’s “theory of knowledge” subject: Findings from an Australian study. Australian Journal of Education, 59(3), 247–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004944115603529
Costa, S. (2016). Math discourse in a grade 2 knowledge building classroom. Master’s thesis, University of Toronto.
Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making. Paris: UNESCO.
Gan, Y., Scardamalia, M., Hong, H.-Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). Early development of graphical literacy through knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). http://dx/doi.org/10.21432/T2C01S
Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1404_4
Hewitt, J., & Teplovs, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL ’99), 12–15 December 1999, Palo Alto, CA, USA (pp. 232–241). International Society of the Learning Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1150240.1150269
Hong, H. Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment. Computers & Education, 71, 279–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.009
Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2015). Fostering sustained idea improvement with principle-based knowledge building analytic tools. Computers & Education, 89, 91–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.012
Jonassen, D. H., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885
Khanlari, A., Resendes, M., Zhu, G., & Scardamalia, M. (2017). Productive knowledge building discourse through student-generated questions. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, & K. Y. Lim (Eds.), Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2017), 18–22 June 2017, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Volume 2, pp. 585–588). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Khanlari, A., Zhu, G., Costa, S., Scardamalia, M. (2018). Criss-crossing science domains in knowledge building communities: An exploratory study. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2018), 23–27 June 2018, London, UK (Volume 3, pp. 1719–1720). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., ... & Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM education: An interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316
Maute, J. (1992). Cross-curricular connections. In J. H. Lounsbury (Ed.), Connecting the curriculum through interdisciplinary instruction (microfiche cards) (pp. 73–77), Columbus OH: National Middle School Association.
Mercer, N. (2007). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jal.v1i2.137
Messina, R. (2001). Intentional learners, cooperative knowledge building, and classroom inventions. From Session 21.45 New Directions in Knowledge Building. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA 2001), 10–14 April 2001, Seattle, WA, USA. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED454178
NRC (National Research Council). (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). (2010). Creative approaches that raise standards. www.creativitycultureeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/learning-creative-approaches-that-raise-standards-250.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1–8: Science and Technology. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/scientec18currb.pdf
Oshima, J., Oshima, R., & Matsuzawa, Y. (2012). Knowledge building discourse explorer: A social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 903–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9265-2
Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning, part I. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Resendes, M. (2014). Enhancing knowledge building discourse in early primary education: Effects of formative feedback. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 309–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9219-x
Roberts, P. (2006). Nurturing creativity in young people. London: DCMS.
Savage, J. (2010). Cross curricular teaching and learning in the secondary school. London, Routledge.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/knowledge forum. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183–192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 38–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 17, Suppl. 3, Learning Technology Innovation in Canada, pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2016). Creating, crisscrossing, and rising above idea landscapes. In R. H. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. K. Price (Eds.), ICT in education in global context: Comparative reports of K–12 schools innovation (pp. 3–16). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Scottish Government. (2008). Curriculum for Excellence. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2008/06/06104407/5
Sternberg, R. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence and creativity synthesised. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38(2), 147–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9082-5
Tarchi, C., Chuy, M., Donahue, Z., Stephenson, C., Messina, R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Knowledge building and knowledge forum: Getting started with the pedagogy and technology. Learning Landscapes, 6(2), 385–407.
Teo, C. L. (2012). Conceptual shifts within problem spaces as a function of years of knowledge building experience. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794547.003.0006
van Aalst, J., & Cummings, M. (2006). Implementing knowledge building: Analysis of a face-to-face discussion by grade four students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6, 351–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556710
van Aalst, J., Mu, J., & Yang, Y. (2015). Formative assessment of computer-supported collaborative learning and knowledge building. In P. Reimann, S. Bull, M. Kickmeier-Rust, R. Vatrapu, & B. Wasson (Eds.), Measuring and visualizing learning in the information-rich classroom (pp. 154–166). New York: Routledge.
Wysocky, M. (2016). Investigating how teachers effectively implement cross-curricular DPA, and identifying perceived benefits and barriers associated with crosscurricular daily physical activity. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41305913
Zhang, J., Tao, D., Sun, Y., Chen, M. H., Peebles, B., & Naqvi, S. (2015). Metadiscourse on collective knowledge progress to inform sustained knowledge-building discourse. Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference (AERA 2015), 16–20 April 2015, Chicago, IL, USA. https://tccl.arcc.albany.edu/wpsite/wp-content/uploads/AERA15_ITMYear2_FullPaper.pdf
Zhu, G., & Kim, M. S. (2017). A review of assessment tools of knowledge building: Towards the norm of embedded and transformative assessment. Paper presented in Knowledge Building Summer Institute (KBSI 2017), 18–22 June 2017, Philadelphia, PA. http://ikit.org/kbsi2017/sites/kbsi2017/files/a_review_of_assessment_tools_of_knowledge_building_towards_the_norm_of_embedded_and_transformative_assessment_final.pdf
How to Cite
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License, Attribution - NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).