Cross-Country Differences in Teachers’ Use of Learning Analytics
Insights from Finland, Estonia, and Azerbaijan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9175Keywords:
learning analytics, teacher perceptions, cross-cultural study, educational technology adoption, research paperAbstract
This qualitative study examined how K–12 teachers in Finland, Estonia, and Azerbaijan view and use learning analytics (LA). The three cases were selected to represent different levels of school-system digital maturity and institutional support for data use to enable a comparative view of teacher adoption across contrasting contexts. Twelve teachers joined online workshops in which six classroom scenarios were discussed. The findings show that national context shapes both expectations and everyday practice. Estonian and Finnish teachers, working in well-connected schools, described using analytics to adjust lessons and maintain pupil interest. Azerbaijani teachers, working with less reliable digital systems, treated analytics mainly as a way to record scores, detect cheating, and report progress to families. Across all three countries, teachers raised four shared concerns: whether the numbers truly reflect learning, how to read complex dashboards, how to respect student privacy, and how to keep professional judgment central. We suggest that LA will help in teaching only when tools fit local conditions and give educators clear, workable information. The study complements existing cross-national LA research by providing a teacher-centred comparison across three contrasting school systems and highlighting the need for teacher-centred design and continuing professional support.
References
Ahmad, T. (2020). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2018-0136
Aliyev, M., & Aliyeva, S. (2024). Revisiting digital transformation of Azerbaijan higher education in the new digital era. Yildiz Social Science Review, 10(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.1441943
Alonzo, D., Quimno, V., Townend, G., & Oo, C. Z. (2024). Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023). Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 36(4), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-024-09443-8
Altstadt, A. L. (2020). Azerbaijan: Politics, society and economy since independence. In G. M. Yemelianova & L. Broers (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the Caucasus (pp. 155–173). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055628-10
Alzahrani, A. S., Tsai, Y. S., Aljohani, N., Whitelock-Wainwright, E., & Gasevic, D. (2023). Do teaching staff trust stakeholders and tools in learning analytics? A mixed methods study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1471–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10229-w
AlZoubi, D., & Baran, E. (2024). A closer look at instructor use and sensemaking processes of analytics dashboards: Past, present, and future. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.7961
Baker, R. (2023). Getting past the current trade-off between privacy and equity in educational technology. In G. Brown III & C. A. Makridis (Eds.), The economics of equity in K-12 education: Connecting financial investments with effective programming (pp. 123–138). Rowman & Littlefield. https://learninganalytics.upenn.edu/ryanbaker/Baker-EdTechPrivacy.pdf
Baker, R. S. (2019). Challenges for the future of educational data mining: The Baker Learning Analytics Prizes. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3554745
Baker, R. S. D., Corbett, A. T., Roll, I., Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Cocea, M., & Mathews, M. (2013). Modeling and studying gaming the system with educational data mining. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 97–115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_7
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review, 37, 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489
Barany, A., Nasiar, N., Porter, C., Zambrano, A. F., Andres, A. L., Bright, D., Shah, M., Liu, X., Gao, S., Zhang, J., Mehta, S., Choi, J., & Baker, C. G. R. S. (2024). ChatGPT for education research: Exploring the potential of large language models for qualitative codebook development. In A. Olney, I. Chounta, Z. Liu, O. Santos, & I. Bittencourt (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. AIED 2024. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 134–149, Vol. 14830). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_10
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929
Bautista-Godínez, T., Castañeda-Garza, G., Mora, R. P., Ceballos, H. G., de la Luz, V. L., Moreno-Salinas, J. G., & Sánchez-Mendiola, M. (2024). Perspectives and opportunities for learning analytics integration: A qualitative study in Mexican universities. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8125
Bergman, P., & Chen, E. (2017). Leveraging parents: The impact of high-frequency information on student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 125–158. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.56.1.1118-9837R1
Borgnakke, K. (2019). Ethnographic methods for researching innovative education. In K. Hytten (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.542
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Broderick, Z., O’Connor, C., Mulcahy, C., Heffernan, N., & Heffernan, C. (2011). Increasing parent engagement in student learning using an intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22(4), 523–550. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/34133/
Buchanan, R., & McPherson, A. (2019). Teachers and learners in a time of big data. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 6(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.21913/JPS.v6i1.1566
Campos, F. C., Ahn, J., DiGiacomo, D. K., Nguyen, H., & Hays, M. (2021). Making sense of sensemaking: Understanding how K–12 teachers and coaches react to visual analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(3), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7113
Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00023-0
Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
Chatti, M. A., Muslim, A., Guliani, M., & Guesmi, M. (2020). The LAVA model: Learning analytics meets visual analytics. In D. Ifenthaler & D. C. Gibson (Eds.), Adoption of data analytics in higher education learning and teaching (pp. 71–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47392-1_5
Chavan, P., & Mitra, R. (2022). Tcherly: A teacher-facing dashboard for online video lectures. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(3), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7555
Cranmer, S., & Ulicsak, M. (2015). Development of the future classroom toolkit. In F. Van Assche, L. Anido, D. Griffiths, C. Lewin, & S. McNicol (Eds.), Re-engineering the uptake of ICT in schools (pp. 17–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19366-3_2
Dalrymple, K. R., Wong, S., Rosenblum, A., Wuenschell, C., Paine, M., & Shuler, C. F. (2007). PBL core skills faculty development workshop 3: Understanding PBL process assessment and feedback via scenario-based discussons, observation, and role-play. Journal of Dental Education, 71(12), 1561–1573. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.12.tb04433.x
Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Billiet, J., & Meuleman, B. (Eds.). (2018). Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Digital Watch Observatory. (2023). Finland’s policies for the digitalisation of education and training until 2027. https://dig.watch/resource/finlands-policies-for-the-digitalisation-of-education-and-training-until-2027
Education Estonia. (2024). Data. https://www.educationestonia.org/data/
Elias, T. (2011). Learning analytics: Definitions, processes and potential [Report]. https://heretothere.trubox.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2016/10/LearningAnalyticsDefinitionsProcessesPotential.pdf
Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. (2016). “walking a fine line": Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1167960
European Commission. (2024, August). The digital economy and society index (DESI). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
Evans, D. K., & Béteille, T. (2021). Successful teachers, successful students: Recruiting and supporting society’s most crucial profession (Report). World Bank. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/37474
Evans, S. C., Roberts, M. C., Keeley, J. W., Blossom, J. B., Amaro, C. M., Garcia, A. M., & Reed, G. M. (2015). Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001
Ferguson, R., Clow, D., Macfadyen, L., Essa, A., Dawson, S., & Alexander, S. (2014, March). Setting learning analytics in context: Overcoming the barriers to large-scale adoption. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2014), 24–28 March 2014, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA (pp. 251–253). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567592
Ferguson, R., Brasher, A., Clow, D., Cooper, A., Hillaire, G., Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Ullmann, T., & Vuorikari, R. (2016, December). Research evidence on the use of learning analytics: Implications for education policy (R. Vuorikari & J. C. Muñoz, Eds.; JRC Science for Policy Report No. EUR 28294 EN). Joint Research Centre, European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2791/955210
Foster, E., & Siddle, R. (2020). The effectiveness of learning analytics for identifying at-risk students in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(6), 842–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1682118
Freitas, E., Fonseca, F., Garcia, V., Pontual Falcão, T., Marques, E., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2024). MMALA: Developing and evaluating a maturity model for adopting learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8099
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
Gašević, D., Tsai, Y. S., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2019). How do we start? An approach to learning analytics adoption in higher education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(4), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2019-0024
Hartwell, C. A. (2013). A Eurasian (or a Soviet) union? Consequences of further economic integration in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Business Horizons, 56(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.03.003
Herrenkohl, L. R., & Cornelius, L. (2013). Investigating elementary students’ scientific and historical argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 413–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.799475
Hilliger, I., Ceballos, H. G., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., & Ferreira, R. (2024). Applications of learning analytics in Latin America. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8409
Honkasilta, J., Ahtiainen, R., Hienonen, N., & Jahnukainen, M. (2019). Inclusive and special education and the question of equity in education: The case of Finland. In M. J. Schuelka, C. J. Johnstone, G. Thomas, & A. J. Artiles (Eds.), The SAGE handbook on inclusion and diversity in education (pp. 481–495). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526470430.n39
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.- K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Ilomäki, L., & Lakkala, M. (2018). Digital technology and practices for school improvement: Innovative digital school model. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0094-8
Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Konradsen, F. (2022). Digital ethnography in higher education teaching and learning—a methodological review. Higher Education, 84(5), 1143–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00838-4
Joarder, S., Chatti, M. A., Mirhashemi, S., & Ain, Q. U. (2023). Towards a flexible user interface for “quick and dirty” learning analytics indicator design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01711. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.01711
Kaliisa, R., & Dolonen, J. A. (2023). CADA: A teacher-facing learning analytics dashboard to foster teachers’ awareness of students’ participation and discourse patterns in online discussions. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09598-7
Kaliisa, R., Mørch, A. I., & Kluge, A. (2022). “My point of departure for analytics is extreme skepticism”: Implications derived from an investigation of university teachers’ learning analytics perspectives and design practices. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09488-w
Karimov, A., Saarela, M., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2023). The impact of online educational platform on students’ motivation and grades: The case of Khan Academy in the under-resourced communities. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2023), 11–14 July 2023, Bengaluru, India (pp. 466–473). International Educational Data Mining Society. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8115746
Karimov, A., Saarela, M., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2024). Teachers’ adoption of AI tools: Motivations, challenges, and skills required. In C. J. Bonk & G. H. Marks (Eds.), eLearn: World Conference on EdTech, 7 October 2024, Singapore (pp. 610–615). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/225103/
Kerr, B., Hawkins, T. L., Herman, R., Barnes, S., Kaufmann, S., Fraser, K., & Ma, I. W. (2013). Feasibility of scenario-based simulation training versus traditional workshops in continuing medical education: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Education Online, 18(1), 21312. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21312
Khosravi, H., Shabaninejad, S., Bakharia, A., Sadiq, S., Indulska, M., & Gasevic, D. (2021). Intelligent learning analytics dashboards: Automated drill-down recommendations to support teacher data exploration. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(3), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7279
Leitner, P., Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education—a literature review. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 1–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_1
Li, Q., Jung, Y., & Wise, A. F. (2025). How instructors use learning analytics: The pivotal role of pedagogy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 38, 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09432-w
Márquez, L., Henríquez, V., Chevreux, H., Scheihing, E., & Guerra, J. (2024). Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13385
Mejia-Domenzain, P., Laini, E., Neshaei, S. P., Wambsganss, T., & Käser, T. (2023, June). Visualizing self-regulated learner profiles in dashboards: Design insights from teachers. In N. Wang, G. Rebolledo-Mendez, V. Dimitrova, N. Matsuda, & O. Santos (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. Posters and late breaking results, workshops and tutorials, industry and innovation tracks, practitioners, doctoral consortium and blue sky. AIED 2023. Communications in computer and information science (pp. 619–624, Vol. 1831). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_96
Michos, K., Schmitz, M. L., & Petko, D. (2023). Teachers’ data literacy for learning analytics: A central predictor for digital data use in upper secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14453–14471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11772-y
Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (2016, November). Diaqnostik qiym@tl@ndirm@nin keçirilm@sin@ baslanılır [Diagnostic assessment of teachers begins]. https://edu.gov.az/az/news-and-updates/13237
Molebatsi, M. (2015). Socio-technical factors that influence learning management systems’ adoption in developing countries. In T. H. Brown & H. J. van der Merwe (Eds.), The mobile learning voyage—from small ripples to massive open waters. mLearn 2015. Communications in computer and information science (pp. 391–404, Vol. 560). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_29
Morgan, H. (2014). Review of research: The education system in Finland: A success story other countries can emulate. Childhood Education, 90(6), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2014.983013
Motz, B. A., Bergner, Y., Brooks, C. A., Gladden, A., Gray, G., Lang, C., Li, W., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Quick, J. D. (2023). A LAK of direction: Misalignment between the goals of learning analytics and its research scholarship. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7913
Mukred, M., Asma’Mokhtar, U., Hawash, B., AlSalman, H., & Zohaib, M. (2024). The adoption and use of learning analytics tools to improve decision making in higher learning institutions: An extension of technology acceptance model. Heliyon, 10(4), e26315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26315
Nouri, J., Ebner, M., Ifenthaler, D., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., Khalil, M., Viberg, O., Bruun, J., Conde González, M. Á., Papamitsiou, Z., & Berthelsen, U. D. (2019). Efforts in Europe for data-driven improvement of education—A review of learning analytics research in seven countries. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education, 1(1), 8–27. https://hdl.handle.net/1956/23178
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume V): Learning strategies and attitudes for life. https://doi.org/10.1787/c2e44201-en
Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49–64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.49
Põldoja, H., Väljataga, T., Laanpere, M., & Tammets, K. (2014). Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies. World Wide Web, 17(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2
Prinsloo, P., & Kaliisa, R. (2022). Learning analytics on the African continent: An emerging research focus and practice. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7539
Proudfoot, K. (2021). Panopticism, teacher surveillance and the “unseen.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(5–6), 812–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1914549
Qazi, A. G., & Pachler, N. (2024). Conceptualising a data analytics framework to support targeted teacher professional development. Professional Development in Education, 51(3), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2422066
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Scenario-based design. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 1032–1050). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Saarela, M. (2017). Automatic knowledge discovery from sparse and large-scale educational data: Case Finland [Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä]. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/54268
Schwartz, K. (2018). The lives of teachers in under-resourced communities: Implications for intervention, professional development, implementation, and educational quality [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. New York University.
Selwyn, N. (2019). What’s the problem with learning analytics? Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.3
Sergis, S., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: A systematic literature review. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 25–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_2
Shibani, A., Knight, S., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2020). Educator perspectives on learning analytics in classroom practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 46, 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100730
Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366
Svaricek, R. (2024). Sceptical teacher and silent students: A case study of teacher changes during a teacher professional development programme. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2023.2296459
Taagepera, R. (2018). Estonia: Return to independence. Routledge.
Tan, J. P. L., & Koh, E. (2017). Situating learning analytics pedagogically: Towards an ecological lens. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1305661
Tsai, Y. S. (2022). Why feedback literacy matters for learning analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00879. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.00879
Tsai, Y. S., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., & Gašević, D. (2021). More than figures on your laptop: (Dis)trustful implementation of learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(3), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7379
Tzimas, D., & Demetriadis, S. (2025). K–12 teachers’ acceptance and resistance perceptions of learning analytics adoption: A mixed-methods approach. TechTrends, 69, 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01045-5
Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., & Santos, J. L. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479363
Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2021). Desperately seeking the impact of learning analytics in education at scale: Marrying data analysis with teaching and learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.06680. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.06680
Viberg, O., Jivet, I., & Scheffel, M. (2023). Designing culturally aware learning analytics: A value sensitive perspective. In O. Viberg & Å. Grönlund (Eds.), Practicable learning analytics (pp. 177–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27646-0_10
Wilson, A., Watson, C., Thompson, T. L., Drew, V., & Doyle, S. (2017). Learning analytics: Challenges and limitations. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(8), 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026
Wise, A. F., & Vytasek, J. (2017). Learning analytics implementation design. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 151–160). Society for Learning Analytics Research. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.013
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Analytics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
