Peer Promotions as a Method to Identify Quality Content
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.12.7Keywords:
Blogging, social blogging, liking, promoting, assessment, quality content, learning analytics, knowledge community, social recommendation, recommender systemAbstract
Promoting blog content is a social activity — a means of communicating one student’s appreciation of another student’s work. This article explores the feasibility of using student promotions of content, in a blogosphere, to identify quality content, and implications for students and instructors. We show that students actively and voluntarily promote content, identify quality material with considerable accuracy, and use promotion data to select what to read. We explore the benefits of knowing which students are good and poor predictors of quality content, and what instructors can do with this information in terms of feedback and guidance.
Downloads
Published
2014-08-07
How to Cite
Gunnarsson, B. L., & Alterman, R. (2014). Peer Promotions as a Method to Identify Quality Content. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 126-150. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.12.7
Issue
Section
Special Issue - LAK'13 selected, extended, and revised papers
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License, Attribution - NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).