Exploring the Link Between Motivational Regulation and Learning Design with Learning Analytics
A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8469Keywords:
motivation, self-regulated learning (SRL), learning analytics , learning design, Technology-enhanced learning, research paperAbstract
Effective learning design (LD) grounded in sound pedagogy is a critical driver of student success. Therefore, it is important to explore how LD of online learning environments influences student ability to manage their own learning. This understanding can inform the development of online programs that prioritize student-driven learning. Research increasingly shows that students can monitor and regulate their own motivation, significantly impacting their academic achievement. Based on the concept of motivational regulation (MR) as a context-dependent process, this systematic review aims to identify existing learning analytics research that examines the link between MR and LD as a key contextual factor. The findings reveal that: 1) there is a lack of consistency in how motivation is measured, operationalized, and applied within the learning analytics literature; 2) self-reporting through surveys remains the most common approach for measuring and operationalizing MR; 3) LD is primarily operationalized at the session and learning activity level, with descriptions focusing on pedagogical principles and strategies; and 4) most studies address the relation between motivational constructs and persistence or academic achievements by looking at variables such as performance or/and outcomes rather than the processes that influence motivational changes and the relationship between MR and LD.
References
Ahn, B., & Harley, J. M. (2020). Facial expressions when learning with a queer history app: Application of the control value theory of achievement emotions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1563–1576. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12989
Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2019). Motivation and learning: Measures and methods. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 665–688). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823279.028
Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A. J., Liatsis, P., & Keight, R. (2018). Analyzing learners behavior in MOOCs: An examination of performance and motivation using a data-driven approach. IEEE Access, 6, 73669–73685. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876755
Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.007
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Artino, A., & Ioannou, A. (2008). Promoting academic motivation and self-regulation: Practical guidelines for online instructors. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE 2008), 3 March 2008, Las Vegas, NV, USA (pp. 208–212). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/27160/
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
Bakharia, A., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., Kennedy, G., Gašević, D., Mulder, R., Williams, D., Dawson, S., & Lockyer, L. (2016). A conceptual framework linking learning design with learning analytics. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’16), 25–29 April 2016, Edinburgh, UK (pp. 329–338). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883944
Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G. T., Tiu, C. J. S., Clarion, C. A., & Reyes, J. C. B. (2021). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z
Beheshitha, S. S., Hatala, M., Gašević, D., & Joksimović, S. (2016). The role of achievement goal orientations when studying effect of learning analytics visualizations. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’16), 25–29 April 2016, Edinburgh, UK (pp. 54–63). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883904
Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Bernacki, M. L. (2015). Addressing complexities in self-regulated learning: A focus on contextual factors, contingencies, and dynamic relations. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9134-6
Bernacki, M. L., Vosicka, L., & Utz, J. C. (2020). Can a brief, digital skill training intervention help undergraduates “learn to learn” and improve their STEM achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000405
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Chen, L., Goda, Y., Shimada, A., & Yamada, M. (2019). Factors investigation of learning behaviors affecting learning performance and self-regulated learning. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education (TALE 20), 10–13 December 2019, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48000.2019.9225926
Chen, S., Liu, Y., Lu, R., Zhou, Y., Lee, Y.-C., & Huang, Y. (2022). “Mirror, mirror, on the wall”: Promoting self-regulated learning using affective states recognition via facial movements. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’22), 13–17 June 2022, Virtual, Australia (pp. 1300–1314). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533500
Cicchinelli, A., Veas, E., Pardo, A., Pammer-Schindler, V., Fessl, A., Barreiros, C., & Lindstädt, S. (2018). Finding traces of self-regulated learning in activity streams. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’18), 7–9 March 2018, Sydney, NSW, Australia (pp. 191–200). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170381
Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0
Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., Cameron, L., Badilescu-Buga, E., & Bower, M. (2016). The Larnaca declaration on learning design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.407
Davis, D., Jivet, I., Kizilcec, R. F., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2017). Follow the successful crowd: Raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’17), 13–17 March 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 454–463). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027411
de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130
de Barba, P. G., Malekian, D., Oliveira, E. A., Bailey, J., Ryan, T., & Kennedy, G. (2020). The importance and meaning of session behaviour in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 146, 103772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103772
de la Fuente-Arias, J. (2017). Theory of self- vs. externally-regulated learningTM: Fundamentals, evidence, and applicability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01675
Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8
Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self‐regulated learning in computer‐based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 557–573.
Dietrich, J., Greiner, F., Weber-Liel, D., Berweger, B., Kämpfe, N., & Kracke, B. (2021). Does an individualized learning design improve university student online learning? A randomized field experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106819
Dobozy, E. (2011). Typologies of learning design and the introduction of a “LD-Type 2” case example. eLearning Papers, 27, 1–11. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22874
Donker, A. S., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath van Ewijk, C. C., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
Duffy, M. C., & Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041
Edisherashvili, N., Saks, K., Pedaste, M., & Leijen, Ä. (2022). Supporting self-regulated learning in distance learning contexts at higher education level: Systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 792422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792422
Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2017). Where is the evidence? A call to action for learning analytics. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’17), 13–17 March 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 56–65). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027396
Ferguson, R., Khosravi, H., Kovanović, V., Viberg, O., Aggarwal, A., Brinkhuis, M., Buckingham Shum, S., Chen, L. K., Drachsler, H., Guerrero, V. A., Hanses, M., Hayward, C., Hicks, B., Jivet, I., Kitto, K., Kizilcec, R., Lodge, J. M., Manly, C. A., Matz, R. L., … Yan, V. X. (2023). Aligning the goals of learning analytics with its research scholarship: An open peer commentary approach. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(2), 14–50. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.8197
Fincham, E., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., van Staalduinen, J.-P., & Gašević, D. (2019). Counting clicks is not enough: Validating a theorized model of engagement in learning analytics. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’19), 4–8 March 2019, Tempe, AZ, USA (pp. 501–510). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303775
Gabriel, F., Cloude, E. B., & Azevedo, R. (2022). Using learning analytics to measure motivational and affective processes during self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies. In Y. Wang, S. Joksimović, M. O. Z. San Pedro, J. D. Way, & J. Whitmer (Eds.), Social and emotional learning and complex skills assessment: An inclusive learning analytics perspective (pp. 93–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06333-6_6
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
Heikkinen, S., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., & Tedre, M. (2023). Supporting self-regulated learning with learning analytics interventions: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3059–3088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11281-4
Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019
Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Conijn, R., & Kester, L. (2020). Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 146, 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
Jin, S.-H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC horizon report: 2013 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED559358.pdf
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Pardo, A., Dawson, S., & Whitelock-Wainwright, A. (2019). Introducing meaning to clicks: Towards traced-measures of self-efficacy and cognitive load. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’19), 4–8 March 2019, Tempe, AZ, USA (pp. 511–520). https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303782
Jovanović, J., Saqr, M., Joksimović, S., & Gašević, D. (2021). Students matter the most in learning analytics: The effects of internal and instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Computers & Education, 172, 104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104251
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
Khalil, M., Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2022). A comparison of learning analytics frameworks: A systematic review. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’22), 21–25 March 2022, Online USA (pp. 152–163). ACM Press https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506878
Kia, F. S., Hatala, M., Baker, R. S., & Teasley, S. D. (2021). Measuring students’ self-regulatory phases in LMS with behavior and real-time self report. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’21), 12–16 April 2021, Irvine, CA, USA (pp. 259–268). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448164
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kryshko, O., Fleischer, J., Waldeyer, J., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2020). Do motivational regulation strategies contribute to university students’ academic success? Learning and Individual Differences, 82, 101912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101912
Larmuseau, C., Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational characteristics on students’ use of a 4C/ID-based online learning environment and their learning gain. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’18), 7–9 March 2018, Sydney, NSW, Australia (pp. 171–180). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170363
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
Ljubin-Golub, T., Petričević, E., & Rovan, D. (2019). The role of personality in motivational regulation and academic procrastination. Educational Psychology, 39(4), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1537479
Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. (2019). Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(4), 516–534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673
Matcha, W., Gašević, D., Uzir, N. A., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A., Lim, L., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Gentili, S., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Tsai, Y.-S. (2020). Analytics of learning strategies: Role of course design and delivery modality. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(2), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.72.3
Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2020). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2019.2916802
Miele, D. B., & Scholer, A. A. (2018). The role of metamotivational monitoring in motivation regulation. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1371601
Milikić, N., Gašević, D., & Jovanović, J. (2020). Measuring effects of technology-enabled mirroring scaffolds on self-regulated learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2885743
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pardo, A., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., Dawson, S., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Exploring student interactions with preparation activities in a flipped classroom experience. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2858790
Pardo, A., Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2017). Combining university student self-regulated learning indicators and engagement with online learning events to predict academic performance. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 82–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2639508
Park, S., & Yun, H. (2018). The influence of motivational regulation strategies on online students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1412738
Persico, D., & Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12207
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731–810). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_16
Reimann, P. (2016). Connecting learning analytics with learning research: The role of design-based research. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1210198
Rienties, B., Nguyen, Q., Holmes, W., & Reedy, K. (2017). A review of ten years of implementation and research in aligning learning design with learning analytics at the Open University UK. Interaction Design & Architecture(s) Journal, 33, 134–154. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-033-007
Roll, I., & Winne, P. H. (2015). Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.2
Rovers, S. F. E., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Granularity matters: Comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6
Schnaubert, L., & Herold, B. (2020). Social-distance education: Struggling with cognition, emotion or motivation during SRL? 28th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2020), 23–27 November 2020, Online.
Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). The importance of students’ motivational dispositions for designing learning analytics. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9188-y
Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Investigating prompts for supporting students’ self-regulation: A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches? The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791
Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome: Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006
Schwinger, M., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2012). Effects of motivational regulation on effort and achievement: A mediation model. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.07.005
Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2015). Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 72–100. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.5
Srivastava, N., Fan, Y., Rakovic, M., Singh, S., Jovanović, J., van der Graaf, J., Lim, L., Surendrannair, S., Kilgour, J., Molenaar, I., Bannert, M., Moore, J., & Gašević, D. (2022). Effects of internal and external conditions on strategies of self-regulated learning: A learning analytics study. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’22), 21–25 March 2022, Online USA (pp. 392–403). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506972
Talbi, O., & Ouared, A. (2022). Goal-oriented student motivation in learning analytics: How can a requirements-driven approach help? Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12083–12121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11091-8
Taub, M., & Azevedo, R. (2018). Using sequence mining to analyze metacognitive monitoring and scientific inquiry based on levels of efficiency and emotions during game-based learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 10(3), 1–26.
Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Rajendran, R., Cloude, E. B., Biswas, G., & Price, M. J. (2021). How are students’ emotions related to the accuracy of cognitive and metacognitive processes during learning with an intelligent tutoring system? Learning and Instruction, 72, 101200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.04.001
Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., Mittelmeier, J., & Nguyen, Q. (2018). Student profiling in a dispositional learning analytics application using formative assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.010
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038
Theobald, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976
Tinajero, C., Mayo, M. E., Villar, E., & Martínez-López, Z. (2024). Classic and modern models of self-regulated learning: Integrative and componential analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1307574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307574
van Eekelen, I. M., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning. Higher Education, 50(3), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6362-0
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
Viberg, O., Khalil, M., & Baars, M. (2020). Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: A review of empirical research. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’20), 23–27 March 2020, Frankfurt, Germany (pp. 524–533). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483
Wang, F. H. (2021). Interpreting log data through the lens of learning design: Second-order predictors and their relations with learning outcomes in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 168, 104209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104209
Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.517150
Winne, P. H. (2020). Construct and consequential validity for learning analytics based on trace data. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106457
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
Wolters, C. A. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300202
Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (2013). Assessing and predicting college students’ use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G.-J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
Wong, J., Baars, M., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2021). Examining the use of prompts to facilitate self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106596
Wong, J., Baars, M., He, M., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2021). Facilitating goal setting and planning to enhance online self-regulation of learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106913
Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Liu, L. (2022). Exploring non-traditional learner motivations and characteristics in online learning: A learner profile study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100051
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Analytics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
