Nonlinear Effort-Time Dynamics of Student Engagement in a Web-Based Learning Platform
A Person-Oriented Transition Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8663Keywords:
student engagement, temporal learning analytics, online learning, person-oriented analysis, transition analysis, higher education, research paperAbstract
Behavioural engagement as a predictor of academic success hinges on the interplay between effort and time. Exploring the longitudinal development of engagement is vital for understanding adaptations in learning behaviour and informing educational interventions. However, person-oriented longitudinal studies on student engagement are scarce. Moreover, online engagement metrics are rarely grounded in theory and often result in simplified descriptions overlooking the complexity of engagement processes. This study applies a theory-based operationalization of behavioural engagement to examine the log data of 236 students in a web-based learning platform. We explored 1) whether weekly profiles based on distinct engagement patterns can be identified and 2) how students transition across profiles over time. Hierarchical clustering yielded one Inactive and six active profiles (Fast-Learners, Regular-Learners, Average-Engagement, Minimalists, Struggling-Learners, and Procrastinators). Results suggest heterogeneity in profile emergence, with effective engagement characterized by alignment with the course deadlines. Process mining revealed changes in profile membership across weeks. Profile transitions revealed relative stability among effective groups and greater fluctuation among low-time profiles. By investigating the complexity and temporality of engagement in online learning, our findings provide insights for developing personalized learning support through training artificial intelligence applications and informing learning analytics dashboards.
References
Araka, E., Oboko, R., Maina, E., & Gitonga, R. (2022). Using educational data mining techniques to identify profiles in self-regulated learning: An empirical evaluation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(1), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.5401
Archambault, I., & Dupéré, V. (2017). Joint trajectories of behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in elementary school. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1060931
Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F., Duffy, M., Harley, J., Taub, M., Trevors, G., Cloude, E., Dever, D., Wiedbusch, M., Wortha, F., & Cerezo, R. (2022). Lessons learned and future directions of MetaTutor: Leveraging multichannel data to scaffold self-regulated learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 813632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813632
Barthakur, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Siemens, G., Richey, M., & Dawson, S. (2021). Assessing program-level learning strategies in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, Article 106674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106674
Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Boekaerts, M. (2016). Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process. Learning and Instruction, 43, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.001
Bond, M., Viberg, O., & Bergdahl, N. (2023). The current state of using learning analytics to measure and support K–12 student engagement: A scoping review. In I. Hilliger, H. Khosravi, B. Rienties, & S. Dawson (Eds.), LAK23: 13th international learning analytics and knowledge conference (pp. 240–249). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576085
Brahimi, T., & Sarirete, A. (2015). Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.013
Brown, A., Lawrence, J., Foote, S., Cohen, J., Redmond, P., Stone, C., Kimber, M., & Henderson, R. (2023). Educators’ experiences of pivoting online: Unearthing key learnings and insights for engaging students online. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(7), 1593–1607. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2157798
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014). NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software, 61(6), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06
Chen, X., Breslow, L., & DeBoer, J. (2018). Analyzing productive learning behaviors for students using immediate corrective feedback in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 117, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.013
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: Theoretical foundations and applications. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237–257). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conde, J., López-Pernas, S., Barra, E., & Saqr, M. (2024). The temporal dynamics of procrastination and its impact on academic performance: The case of a task-oriented programming course. In J. Hong, J. W. Park, & A. Przybyłek (Eds.), SAC ’24: Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP symposium on applied computing (pp. 48–55). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636072
De Silva, L. M. H., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Chounta, I.-A., & Pishtari, G. (2024). Curriculum analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09410-8
Dorko, A. (2021). How students use the ‘see similar example’ feature in online mathematics homework. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 63, Article 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100894
Dorko, A., Cook, J. P., & DeHoyos, I. (2023). Learning from lecture and homework: The case for studying intersections of milieu. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 15(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2023.2253023
Er, E., Villa-Torrano, C., Dimitriadis, Y., Gašević, D., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Gómez-Sánchez, E., & Martínez Monés, A. (2021). Theory-based learning analytics to explore student engagement patterns in a peer review activity. In M Scheffel, N. Dowell, S. Joksimović, & G. Siemens (Eds.), LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 196–206). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448158
Faitelson, D., Gul, S., & Arieli, M. (2024). Computer games are scalable and engaging alternatives to traditional undergraduate mathematics homework. PRIMUS, 34(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2023.2269920
Flunger, B., Trautwein, U., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2015). The Janus-faced nature of time spent on homework: Using latent profile analyses to predict academic achievement over a school year. Learning and Instruction, 39, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.008
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Getman, A., Boitcov, M., Adamovich, K., & Costley, J. (2024). The role of engagement strategies and path-dependency in online learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2413440
Gore, P. A., Jr. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 297–321). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50012-4
Günther, C. W., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). Fuzzy Mining: Adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Business process management: 5th international conference, BPM 2007, Brisbane, Australia, September 24–28, 2007, proceedings (pp. 328–343). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_24
He, S., Demmans Epp, C., Chen, F., & Cui, Y. (2024). Examining change in students’ self-regulated learning patterns after a formative assessment using process mining techniques. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, Article 108061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108061
Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 27(1), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398
Hochmuth, R. (2020). Service-courses in university mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 770–774). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100025
Ipinnaiye, O., & Risquez, A. (2024). Exploring adaptive learning, learner-content interaction and student performance in undergraduate economics classes. Computers & Education, 215, Article 105047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105047
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
Kim, D., Lee, Y., Leite, W. L., & Huggins-Manley, A. C. (2020). Exploring student and teacher usage patterns associated with student attrition in an open educational resource-supported online learning platform. Computers & Education, 156, Article 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103961
Kokoç, M., Akçapınar, G., & Hasnine, M. N. (2021). Unfolding students’ online assignment submission behavioral patterns using temporal learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 223–235.
Kong, S.-C., & Lin, T. (2023). Developing self-regulated learning as a pedagogy in higher education: An institutional survey and case study in Hong Kong. Heliyon, 9(11), Article e22115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22115
Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002
Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021307
Li, H., Flanagan, B., Konomi, S., & Ogata, H. (2018). Measuring behaviors and identifying indicators of self-regulation in computer-assisted language learning courses. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0087-7
Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students’ time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
Lim, L., Bannert, M., van der Graaf, J., Singh, S., Fan, Y., Surendrannair, S., Rakovic, M., Molenaar, I., Moore, J., & Gašević, D. (2023). Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, Article 107547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107547
López-Pernas, S., & Saqr, M. (2024). How the dynamics of engagement explain the momentum of achievement and the inertia of disengagement: A complex systems theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, Article 108126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108126
Lust, G., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2013). Regulation of tool-use within a blended course: Student differences and performance effects. Computers & Education, 60(1), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.001
Magalhães, P., Ferreira, D., Cunha, J., & Rosário, P. (2020). Online vs. traditional homework: A systematic review on the benefits to students’ performance. Computers & Education, 152, Article 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103869
Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., Morales, N., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2018). Mining theory-based patterns from big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.011
Marple, S., Jaquet, K., Laudone, A., Sewell, J., & Liepmann, K. (2019). Khan Academy in 7th grade math classes: A case study. WestEd. https://www.wested.org/resources/khan-academy-7th-grade-math
Martin, A. J., Way, J., Bobis, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years of school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529365
Mirriahi, N., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2018). Identifying engagement patterns with video annotation activities: A case study in professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3207
Muir, T. (2014). Google, Mathletics and Khan Academy: Students’ self-initiated use of online mathematical resources. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0128-5
Nath, R., & Pavur, R. (1985). A new statistic in the one-way multivariate analysis of variance. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2(4), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(85)90003-9
Nipa, T. J., & Kermanshachi, S. (2020). Assessment of open educational resources (OER) developed in interactive learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2521–2547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10081-7
Pardo, A., Gašević, D., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Exploring student interactions with preparation activities in a flipped classroom experience. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2858790
Pepin, B., & Kock, Z. (2021). Students’ use of resources in a challenge-based learning context involving mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(2), 306–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00136-x
Pogorskiy, E., & Beckmann, J. F. (2023). From procrastination to engagement? An experimental exploration of the effects of an adaptive virtual assistant on self-regulation in online learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100111
Poquet, O., Jovanovic, J., & Pardo, A. (2023). Student profiles of change in a university course: A complex dynamical systems perspective. In I. Hilliger, H. Khosravi, B. Rienties, & S. Dawson (Eds.), LAK23: 13th international learning analytics and knowledge conference (pp. 197–207). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576077
Prat, A., & Code, W. J. (2021). WeBWorK log files as a rich source of data on student homework behaviours. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(10), 1540–1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1782492
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.2) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2022). Jingle-jangle revisited: History and further evolution of the student engagement construct. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_1
Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Nguyen, Q., & Littlejohn, A. (2019). Unpacking the intertemporal impact of self-regulation in a blended mathematics environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.007
Riestra-González, M., Paule-Ruíz, M. del P., & Ortin, F. (2021). Massive LMS log data analysis for the early prediction of course-agnostic student performance. Computers & Education, 163, Article 104108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104108
Saqr, M., & López-Pernas, S. (2021). The longitudinal trajectories of online engagement over a full program. Computers & Education, 175, Article 104325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104325
Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., Helske, S., & Hrastinski, S. (2023). The longitudinal association between engagement and achievement varies by time, students’ profiles, and achievement state: A full program study. Computers & Education, 199, Article 104787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104787
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Shin, E., & Sohn, W.-S. (2019). A latent profile analysis of primary students’ homework behavior: Homework time and effort. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 22(4), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2019.22.4.105
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Symonds, J. E., Kaplan, A., Upadyaya, K., Aro, K. S., Torsney, B. M., Skinner, E., & Eccles, J. S. (2024). Momentary student engagement as a dynamic developmental system. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/teo0000288
Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., & Nguyen, Q. (2023). Modelling temporality in person- and variable-centred approaches. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(2), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7841
Valle, A., Piñeiro, I., Rodríguez, S., Regueiro, B., Freire, C., & Rosário, P. (2019). Time spent and time management in homework in elementary school students: A person-centered approach. Psicothema, 31(4), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.191
van der Aalst, W. (2016). Process mining: Data science in action. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4
van Eck, M. L., Lu, X., Leemans, S. J. J., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2015). PM2: A process mining project methodology. In J. Zdravkovic, M. Kirikova, & P. Johannesson (Eds.), Advanced information systems engineering: 27th international conference, CAiSE 2015, Stockholm, Sweden, June 8–12, 2015, proceedings (pp. 297–313). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_19
Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., & Winne, P. H. (2020). Analytics for student engagement. In M. Virvou, E. Alepis, G. A. Tsihrintzis, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Machine learning paradigms: Advances in learning analytics (pp. 23–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_3
Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts: A review of empirical research. European Psychologist, 18(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000143
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073
Wang, C., Xu, J., Núñez, J. C., & Rodríguez Martínez, S. (2023). Self-regulation of online homework behavior: Using latent profile analysis to identify online homework management profiles. Educational Psychology, 43(10), 1160–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2283389
Wang, X., Maeda, Y., & Chang, H.-H. (2025). Development and techniques in learner model in adaptive e-learning system: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 225, Article 105184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105184
Wiedbusch, M., Dever, D., Li, S., Amon, M. J., Lajoie, S., & Azevedo, R. (2023). Measuring multidimensional facets of SRL engagement with multimodal data. In V. Kovanović, R. Azevedo, D. C. Gibson, & D. lfenthaler (Eds.), Unobtrusive observations of learning in digital environments: Examining behavior, cognition, emotion, metacognition and social processes using learning analytics (pp. 141–173). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30992-2_10
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 635–651). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_30
Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2021). College students’ time management: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1319–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z
Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G.-J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
Wong, J., Khalil, M., Baars, M., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2019). Exploring sequences of learner activities in relation to self-regulated learning in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 140, Article 103595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103595
Wong, J., Baars, M., He, M., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2021). Facilitating goal setting and planning to enhance online self-regulation of learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, Article 106913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106913
Xu, J. (2022). More than minutes: A person-centered approach to homework time, homework time management, and homework procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 70, Article 102087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102087
Xu, J., & Corno, L. (2022). A person-centred approach to understanding self-regulation in homework using latent profile analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(6), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2041556
Yang, Y., Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Wang, M., Huang, Y.-M., & Lim, H. (2020). Prediction of students’ procrastination behaviour through their submission behavioural pattern in online learning. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02041-8
Zhang, J., Andres, J. M. A. L., Hutt, S., Baker, R. S., Ocumpaugh, J., Mills, C., Brooks, J., Sethuraman, S., & Young, T. (2022). Detecting SMART model cognitive operations in mathematical problem-solving process. In A. Mitrovic & N. Bosch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on educational data mining (pp. 75–85). International Educational Data Mining Society. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6853161
Zhang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of student engagement with receiving peer feedback in L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 60, Article 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100842
Zhen, R., Liu, R.-D., Wang, M.-T., Ding, Y., Jiang, R., Fu, X., & Sun, Y. (2020). Trajectory patterns of academic engagement among elementary school students: The implicit theory of intelligence and academic self-efficacy matters. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12320
Ziegler, N., & Opdenakker, M.-C. (2018). The development of academic procrastination in first-year secondary education students: The link with metacognitive self-regulation, self-efficacy, and effort regulation. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.009
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Analytics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
